Edited by JJ76, 30 April 2011 - 20:31 .
Skoda VRS
Started by JJ76, Apr 30 2011 20:18
10 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 30 April 2011 - 20:18
Down here in Kent a squad car accidentally rammed a lady and her child through the front garden wall of somebodys house, it turns out that they where attending an incident that involved a missing person, my question is this 'Do they really have to put their sirens on and drive like twats for such trivual matters'? Lets be honest, any bloke would love to put his flashing light on and drive really fast and I reckon that down here in the South East of Kent where crime is relatively low they just do it for a buzz!
#2
Posted 30 April 2011 - 20:24
#3
Posted 30 April 2011 - 20:30
What?
If its about the police not recruiting, yes its a bitch. If its about police driving standards, yes at time they are poor...
But still...
If its about the police not recruiting, yes its a bitch. If its about police driving standards, yes at time they are poor...
But still...
#4
Posted 30 April 2011 - 20:34
I see what you did there, you have since me and jimbob posted been and edited your post so it now makes some sence
so why is this thread titled Skoda VRS
so why is this thread titled Skoda VRS
Edited by pavlie, 30 April 2011 - 20:36 .
#5
Posted 30 April 2011 - 20:42
because thats what the boys where driving when they rammed the mum and her small child through the garden wall!
#6
Posted 30 April 2011 - 20:45
anyway I'm ranting so will call it a day. sorry.
#7
Posted 01 May 2011 - 13:29
See what you mean now...
I know for a fact (yes, a fact) that they do do it for a buzz (who wouldn't) but at times it's fucking dangerous... The story of 110mph on New Road Chatham is a bit far...
I know for a fact (yes, a fact) that they do do it for a buzz (who wouldn't) but at times it's fucking dangerous... The story of 110mph on New Road Chatham is a bit far...
#8
Posted 01 May 2011 - 13:59
JJ76, on 30 April 2011 - 20:18 , said:
Down here in Kent a squad car accidentally rammed a lady and her child through the front garden wall of somebodys house, it turns out that they where attending an incident that involved a missing person, my question is this 'Do they really have to put their sirens on and drive like twats for such trivual matters'? Lets be honest, any bloke would love to put his flashing light on and drive really fast and I reckon that down here in the South East of Kent where crime is relatively low they just do it for a buzz!
When did this happen then?
Any linkage to news site?
The major difference between a thing that might go wrong and a thing that cannot possibly go wrong is that when a thing that cannot possibly go wrong goes wrong it usually turns out to be impossible to get at or repair
-----------------------------------------------------------
I will not make any deals with you. I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own
-----------------------------------------------------------
If you've been affected by this, or any of the issues raised in this post/topic you can contact our helpline on: 0800 382 5633 (calls charged @ £25 per min, t&c apply)
-----------------------------------------------------------
I will not make any deals with you. I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own
-----------------------------------------------------------
If you've been affected by this, or any of the issues raised in this post/topic you can contact our helpline on: 0800 382 5633 (calls charged @ £25 per min, t&c apply)
#9
Posted 02 June 2011 - 18:59
Think anyone could be guilt for going over the top, not excusing the plod, was sitting in a trafficjam few months back and caught sight of a copper next to me with a tasty female officer next to him. Could read his lips, watch this. He put his lights on and basically cleared his path through then turned them of. Lady officer was laughing her tits of, think i could have been guilty of doing the same but saying that the incident you report is a lot more seirous and should be prosectued
#10
Posted 27 June 2011 - 16:23
I have been deployed on a Grade 1 response to High Risk Mispers before, so it is entirely possible this was the case here.
#11
Posted 03 August 2011 - 22:16
jimbo666, on 27 June 2011 - 16:23 , said:
I have been deployed on a Grade 1 response to High Risk Mispers before, so it is entirely possible this was the case here.
Exactly could be a very vulnerable child, or someone with mental health issues. By the time you make your way through traffic on a normal run it might be too late
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


