I'm afraid I've joined the dark side...
#61
Posted 30 June 2011 - 01:10
Two things spring to mind. Firstly, this was an unusual tankful, in that it was almost all local driving, which saw me down around 50 MPG on the computer. The final 150 miles or so were on motorways, which bumped the figures from the OBC significantly towards the end of the tank. I'd be interested to see if I see the same error with a more normal tankful.
Secondly, whatever the numbers actually are, it's still more or less halving my fuel bill over the V70R, which was the goal. Presumably the R was similarly lying to me! I'm routinely doubling the mileage I get to a tank over the R, and the tank only appears to be about 10% larger on the D5.
Back in the day (2005-2007), I reckoned I could get 100 miles of motoring to £10 of petrol in the 340 1.4 I was using as a daily driver. I was hoping to achieve that landmark (which I calculated at the time was roughly 50 MPG) with the D5, but I think the rise in fuel costs has put the kibosh on that one!
The "service" message is now being displayed, so I need to schedule that in ASAP.
cheers
James
'88 360 Turbo Intercooler
'84 360 GLT
'81 343 GLS R-Sport
'80 345 DL - for sale
'80 343 DL
'70 164
#62
Posted 30 June 2011 - 06:39

IF YOU CAN'T FIX IT WITH A HAMMER, YOU'VE GOT AN ELECTRICAL PROBLEM!
#63
Posted 30 June 2011 - 11:28
#64
Posted 30 June 2011 - 21:11
cheers
James
'88 360 Turbo Intercooler
'84 360 GLT
'81 343 GLS R-Sport
'80 345 DL - for sale
'80 343 DL
'70 164
#65
Posted 01 July 2011 - 10:35
Do another few and see how they work out

IF YOU CAN'T FIX IT WITH A HAMMER, YOU'VE GOT AN ELECTRICAL PROBLEM!
#66
Posted 01 July 2011 - 11:36
cheers
James
'88 360 Turbo Intercooler
'84 360 GLT
'81 343 GLS R-Sport
'80 345 DL - for sale
'80 343 DL
'70 164
#67
Posted 01 July 2011 - 11:37
HEZI, on 30 June 2011 - 11:28 , said:
Edited by RobbieH, 01 July 2011 - 11:38 .

Don't let your age define you. It's a number, that's all.
Nasty D5 dieseasel with few twiddly bits from TWR, MTE, IPD and Eibach but 600 miles to a tank ain't to be sniffed at :-)
tonyt-5 said:
#69
Posted 03 July 2011 - 10:30
Dream3r, on 16 May 2011 - 20:12 , said:
....Hyper and rampaging like them
grainqey, on 16 May 2011 - 20:27 , said:
#70
Posted 03 July 2011 - 13:23
foggyjames, on 25 May 2011 - 20:42 , said:
It's a bit slow compared with the R, although surprisingly fast up to 40mph or so, and pulls well in 5th. The midrange (40-70) is a bit weak, and I'll be interested to have a ride in another one to see if it's 'right' or not. I suspect it's fine, and I'm just suffering from R withdrawal symptoms. A thorough cleaning of the EGR valve is on the cards. If this is all it has to give, I suspect a remap is in my future. My friend's remapped S60 E3 is just as quick as my V70R, and it also boosted fuel economy. Speaking of which...an overall average of 55-60mpg seems to be what I'm looking at. Very pleased with that.

Overall...I'm very impressed. It feels more 'solid' than the P1, although not as characterful or sporty. It's marginally quieter, and the stereo is better (despite the R having an external power amp, etc). There are a few niggles to sort out, but so far, I'm happy! It's only my daily driver, and I have other cars for petrolhead kicks. The extra £150-300 a month in my back pocket is well worth giving up a bit of a shove in the back for.
Speaking of which....anyone want to buy a V70R....?
cheers
James
good man
you know it makes sense
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


