laptop use,mobile phone
#1
Posted 07 November 2011 - 11:23
Thanks in advance.

Speed has never killed anyone, suddenly becoming stationary, That's what gets you.
A turbo: Exhaust gasses go into the turbocharger and spin it, witchcraft happens and you go faster
#2
Posted 07 November 2011 - 12:14
Quote
The term "driving" has a very wide definition in motoring law matters. You can generally still be considered to be driving, even if you are stationary, sitting in your vehicle off the road, but with your engine running. Turning off your engine may be enough to prevent a successful prosecution.
If you are stuck in a traffic jam, then again you are still driving your car as far the police are concerned and you open up yourself to prosecution if you use your mobile phone other than through a hands-free kit. Every case is different and it is very difficult to lay down hard and fast guidelines.
http://www.lawonthew...nes_and_Driving
#3
Posted 07 November 2011 - 12:18
The law seems to make no mention of "being in charge of a vehicle whilst using a mobile phone"
More specifically the law states "DRIVING"
It seems to be down to what point you cease to be driving.... I think you'd have a good defence if you were in a layby, probably a lesser defence at the side of the high street in busy traffic.
If your engine is off and handbrake on you are clearly not driving.
In some circumstances you can be done for being drunk in charge of a vehicle even when asleep in a parked motor-home in a car park. because the law in that case states "in charge of a vehicle"
To summarize:
It is a well-known fact that those people who most want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it.
To summarize the summary:
Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job.
To summarize the summary of the summary:
People are a problem.
#5
Posted 09 November 2011 - 09:24
'seatbelts MUST be worn at all times whilst in the vehicle'
Now firstly how do you get out, if you are wearing a seatbelt?, at what point are you not in the cab
and secondly what happens if you are in back of van, getting something out
Most rules it seems, are made by people who clearly have never tried, or ever have any intention of abiding by them themselves.

I have to be nice, or Mrs Goggins will beat me with a big stick
#6
Posted 09 November 2011 - 09:28

I have to be nice, or Mrs Goggins will beat me with a big stick
#7
Posted 09 November 2011 - 21:39
Lord B, on 09 November 2011 - 09:24 , said:
'seatbelts MUST be worn at all times whilst in the vehicle'
Lordy, that was clearly just a rule your employers enforced as opposed to 'law'. Same as many councils/local authorities enforce. A lot now have their own points system which mirrors the driving licence points system. If you get enough to get 'disqualified' you get shafted in the post room or something!
As for using a mobile phone in a layby, that is perfectly fine. It's not as simple as whether you are stationary or not. There is a huge difference in being stationary in a lay by and stationary in a queue of traffic, or at a red light where you would be expected to drive off at any second.
Hope this helps :-)
#8
Posted 09 November 2011 - 21:56
Firstly, pedestrians were ALWAYS within whatever distance it said, and the management was only present 6-7 hours during the day, when nothing was happening. Needless to say, none of the idiotic rules were followed.
Edited by Exocet, 09 November 2011 - 21:57 .
#10
Posted 10 November 2011 - 00:47
Lottie, on 08 November 2011 - 12:09 , said:
That's where I read the law carefully....
For phones it stated "driving", for drink it states "in control of a vehicle"
"Parked" may well not be classed as "driving"
You'd have to have seriously pissed of the copper to have them do you for sitting stationary in a place that could be deemed to be "off the carriageway" Even then it would be iffy in court.
To summarize:
It is a well-known fact that those people who most want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it.
To summarize the summary:
Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job.
To summarize the summary of the summary:
People are a problem.
#11
Posted 10 November 2011 - 01:00
Sir Drivealot, on 10 November 2011 - 00:47 , said:
For phones it stated "driving", for drink it states "in control of a vehicle"
"Parked" may well not be classed as "driving"
You'd have to have seriously pissed of the copper to have them do you for sitting stationary in a place that could be deemed to be "off the carriageway" Even then it would be iffy in court.
Like I said, You would NEVER be approached by the police for using a mobi in a layby, engine running or otherwise. Nor would you if parked at the kerb side. Unless you were causing obstruction.
#12
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users




